Most folks start expanding sideways after a certain age, but why do cars have to do the same?
Most folks start expanding sideways after a certain age, but why do cars have to do the same?
Clueless folk like them are missing the point of a smaller car and its virtues such as agility, efficiency, ease of parking and general handiness about town. Why choose a compact car and then complain that it’s too small?
Which is why I love the thinking behind the new Mazda MX-5. The original MX-5 is brilliantly small and lithe, but with each successive generation, it has grown slightly but inexorably.
However, Mazda has cried “enough” and reversed that trend, so that the new fourth generation model is even shorter, lengthwise, than the first.And it’s been done very cleverly. The seats, for instance, use a type of resin webbing for support instead of the usual coil springs, allowing them to be thinner and lighter. A smaller folding top eats up less space when folded, so the boot is now bigger despite the rear overhang being shorter.
Because of all this, the roadster is lighter, wieldier and more efficient, and it outperforms its predecessor even with engines which are no more powerful.
(literally) for Porsche to slot in a smaller model below, the Cayman. It’s odd that if you want something with the handiness of the original 911, you don’t get a new 911 but its junior sibling instead.